موطا امام مالك رواية يحييٰ
Muwatta Imam Malik Riwayat Yahya
Book: On the Explanation of Jihad
باب ما يرد قبل أن يقع القسم مما أصاب العدو
What is returned before division from war spoils
Hadith Number: 975
حدثني يحيى، عن مالك، انه بلغه،" ان عبدا لعبد الله بن عمر ابق، وان فرسا له عار، فاصابهما المشركون، ثم غنمهما المسلمون، فردا على عبد الله بن عمر وذلك قبل ان تصيبهما المقاسم" .
Imam Malik (may Allah have mercy on him) was informed: A slave of Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Umar (may Allah be pleased with them both) had run away, and there was a horse as well, so both of them were captured by the disbelievers. Then the Muslims found both of them among the spoils of war. So both were returned to Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Umar (may Allah be pleased with them both) before the distribution.
تخریج الحدیث: «مرفوع وموقوف صحيح، وأخرجه البخاري 3067، 3068، و أبو داود: 2698، 2699، و ابن ماجه: 2847،، فواد عبدالباقي نمبر: 21 - كِتَابُ الْجِهَادِ-ح: 17»
Hadith Number: 975B5
قال: وسمعت مالكا , يقول فيما يصيب العدو من اموال المسلمين: إنه إن ادرك قبل ان تقع فيه المقاسم فهو رد على اهله، واما ما وقعت فيه المقاسم، فلا يرد على احد.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: If the wealth of Muslims is found with the disbelievers, it will be returned to its owners as long as it has not been distributed; but if it has been distributed, then it will not be returned.
تخریج الحدیث: «فواد عبدالباقي نمبر: 21 - كِتَابُ الْجِهَادِ-ح: 17»
Hadith Number: 975B6
وسئل مالك، عن رجل حاز المشركون غلامه، ثم غنمه المسلمون، قال مالك: صاحبه اولى به بغير ثمن، ولا قيمة، ولا غرم ما لم تصبه المقاسم، فإن وقعت فيه المقاسم، فإني ارى ان يكون الغلام لسيده بالثمن إن شاء.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, was asked about a Muslim's slave who was taken by the disbelievers, and then the Muslims found him among the spoils of war. He replied that the slave will be returned to his owner without any payment as long as it has not been distributed. But when it has been distributed, then the owner has the option to take him back by paying the price.
تخریج الحدیث: «فواد عبدالباقي نمبر: 21 - كِتَابُ الْجِهَادِ-ح: 17»
Hadith Number: 975B7
قال مالك، في ام ولد رجل من المسلمين حازها المشركون، ثم غنمها المسلمون، فقسمت في المقاسم، ثم عرفها سيدها بعد القسم: إنها لا تسترق، وارى ان يفتديها الإمام لسيدها، فإن لم يفعل فعلى سيدها ان يفتديها، ولا يدعها، ولا ارى للذي صارت له ان يسترقها، ولا يستحل فرجها، وإنما هي بمنزلة الحرة لان سيدها يكلف ان يفتديها، إذا جرحت فهذا بمنزلة ذلك فليس له ان يسلم ام ولده، تسترق، ويستحل فرجها.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: If the umm walad of a Muslim is captured by the disbelievers, then the Muslims find her among the spoils of war and she is distributed, and then her owner recognizes her after the distribution, then that umm walad will not be made a slave again. Rather, the Imam should ransom her from the spoils of war and hand her over to her owner. If the Imam does not ransom her, then her owner should ransom her by paying compensation; he should not leave her. And the one in whose share that umm walad has come, it is not permissible for him to make her a slave or to have intercourse with her, because the umm walad is like a free woman. For this reason, if an umm walad injures someone, her owner will be ordered to ransom her by paying compensation. So here too, the same ruling applies that her owner should ransom her in whatever way possible; he should not leave her, nor should she be made a slave or have intercourse with her.
تخریج الحدیث: «فواد عبدالباقي نمبر: 21 - كِتَابُ الْجِهَادِ-ح: 17»
Hadith Number: 975B8
قال يحيى: وسئل مالك، عن الرجل يخرج إلى ارض العدو في المفاداة، او في التجارة، فيشتري الحر، او العبد، او يوهبان له، فقال: اما الحر فإن ما اشتراه به دين عليه، ولا يسترق وإن كان وهب له فهو حر، وليس عليه شيء إلا ان يكون الرجل اعطى فيه شيئا مكافاة فهو دين على الحر، بمنزلة ما اشتري به، واما العبد فإن سيده الاول مخير فيه، إن شاء ان ياخذه، ويدفع إلى الذي اشتراه ثمنه، فذلك له، وإن احب ان يسلمه اسلمه، وإن كان وهب له فسيده الاول احق به، ولا شيء عليه إلا ان يكون الرجل اعطى فيه شيئا مكافاة، فيكون ما اعطى فيه غرما على سيده، إن احب ان يفتديه
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, was asked about a person who went to the land of the disbelievers to free Muslims or for trade, and there he bought both free men and slaves, or the disbelievers gifted them to him? Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, replied: If this person bought a free man, then the amount paid for him will be considered a debt and he will not become a slave, and the one who came as a gift will remain free, and nothing will be due for him, except in the case that something was spent in exchange for the gift, then that amount will be a debt upon him, as if he bought him in exchange. And if this person bought a slave, then the previous owner has the option to take the slave by paying the amount for which he was bought, or not take him and let him remain with the buyer. And the one who came as a gift, the first owner may take the slave for free, but if something was spent in exchange for the gift, then it is necessary for the first owner, if he wishes, to pay that amount and take the slave, or not take him.
تخریج الحدیث: «فواد عبدالباقي نمبر: 21 - كِتَابُ الْجِهَادِ-ح: 17»
