المستدرك على الصحيحين
Al Mustadrak ala al‑Sahihayn
كتاب : البيوع
Book of Sales
نهى رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم أن تباع السلع حيث تبتاع ، حتى يحوزها التجار إلى رحالهم
The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling goods where they are bought until the merchants take them to their own premises
Hadith Number: 2302
حدثناه ابو العباس محمد بن يعقوب، حدثنا ابو زرعة عبد الرحمن بن عمرو الدمشقي، حدثنا احمد بن خالد الوهبي، حدثنا محمد بن إسحاق، عن ابي الزناد، عن عبيد بن حنين، عن ابن عمر، قال: ابتعت زيتا في السوق، فلما استوجبته لقيني رجل، فاعطاني به ربحا حسنا، فاردت ان اضرب على يديه، فاخذ رجل من خلفي بذراعي، فالتفت إليه، فإذا زيد بن ثابت، فقال: لا تبعه حيث ابتعته حتى تحوزه إلى رحلك، فإن رسول الله ﷺ نهى ان تباع السلع حيث تبتاع، حتى يحوزها التجار إلى رحالهم (1).
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Umar (may Allah be pleased with them both) that he said: I bought olive oil in the market. When the deal was concluded, a man met me and offered me a very good profit on it. I wanted to strike the deal with him right then, but a man took hold of my arm from behind. I turned around and saw that it was Sayyiduna Zayd bin Thabit (may Allah be pleased with him). He said: "Do not sell it at the place where you bought it until you take it to your home or lodging, for the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling goods at the place where they were bought until the merchants move them to their own lodgings."
تخریج الحدیث: «حديث صحيح، وهذا إسناد حسن، وقد صرَّح ابن إسحاق بسماعه عند أحمد وغيره، وهو متابع. أبو الزِّناد: هو عبد الله بن ذكوان، وأخرجه أبو داود (3499) عن محمد بن عوف الطائي، عن أحمد بن خالد الوهبي، بهذا الإسناد.» [ترقيم الرساله 2302] [ترقيم الشركة 2284]
Takhrij and Tahqiq of Hadith No. 2302 of Al Mustadrak ala al‑Sahihayn
by Shaykh Adil Murshid, Dr. Ahmad Barhoum, Dr. Muhammad Kamil Qarah Balli and Dr. Sa'id al-Lahham
Hadith-science notes and terminology
by Shaykh Adil Murshid, Dr. Ahmad Barhoum, Dr. Muhammad Kamil Qarah Balli and Dr. Sa'id al-Lahham
Hadith-science notes and terminology
Grading: The hadith is "sahih", and this chain is "hasan", because
Muhammad bin Ishaq explicitly stated that he heard it (directly), as recorded by
Imam Ahmad and others, and there is also corroboration for him.
Note / Clarification:
Abu al-Zinad refers to
Abd Allah bin Dhakwan. It was narrated by
Abu Dawud (3499) through the chain of
Muhammad bin Awf al-Ta'i.
Muhammad bin Ishaq explicitly stated that he heard it (directly), as recorded by
Imam Ahmad and others, and there is also corroboration for him.
Note / Clarification:
Abu al-Zinad refers to
Abd Allah bin Dhakwan. It was narrated by
Abu Dawud (3499) through the chain of
Muhammad bin Awf al-Ta'i.
(1) حديث صحيح، وهذا إسناد حسن، وقد صرَّح ابن إسحاق بسماعه عند أحمد وغيره، وهو متابع. أبو الزِّناد: هو عبد الله بن ذكوان. ¤ ¤ وأخرجه أبو داود (3499) عن محمد بن عوف الطائي، عن أحمد بن خالد الوهبي، بهذا الإسناد.
Reference / Source: It was narrated by
Imam Ahmad (35/ 21668) and
Ibn Hibban (4984) with the chain
Ibrahim bin Sa'd, from
Muhammad bin Ishaq.
Imam Ahmad (35/ 21668) and
Ibn Hibban (4984) with the chain
Ibrahim bin Sa'd, from
Muhammad bin Ishaq.
وأخرجه أحمد 35/ (21668)، وابن حبان (4984) من طريق إبراهيم بن سعد، عن محمد بن إسحاق، به.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports:
Muhammad bin Ishaq was corroborated by
Jarir bin Hazim in the narrations of
Imam al-Tahawi,
al-Tabarani (4781) and
al-Daraqutni (2829), and this chain is "sahih".
Muhammad bin Ishaq was corroborated by
Jarir bin Hazim in the narrations of
Imam al-Tahawi,
al-Tabarani (4781) and
al-Daraqutni (2829), and this chain is "sahih".
وقد تابع محمدَ بنَ إسحاق عليه جريرُ بن حازم عند الطحاوي في "شرح مشكل الآثار" (3165)، والطبراني في "المعجم الكبير" (4781)، والدارقطني (2829)، وإسناده صحيح.
Juristic point:
Imam al-Tahawi says that
Ibn Umar's taking this matter in this hadith from
Zayd apparently seems to conflict with his own narration (not to sell grain before receiving it). The answer to this is that perhaps
Ibn Umar did not count "olive oil" (zayt) as food (ta'am), since it is used as a condiment, and his own view was that things other than grain may be sold before taking possession. But when
Zayd narrated the hadith to him, he learned that olive oil too has the ruling of grain, so he refrained from selling it.
Imam al-Tahawi says that
Ibn Umar's taking this matter in this hadith from
Zayd apparently seems to conflict with his own narration (not to sell grain before receiving it). The answer to this is that perhaps
Ibn Umar did not count "olive oil" (zayt) as food (ta'am), since it is used as a condiment, and his own view was that things other than grain may be sold before taking possession. But when
Zayd narrated the hadith to him, he learned that olive oil too has the ruling of grain, so he refrained from selling it.
وقد ذكر الطحاوي في "شرح المشكل" بإثر (3166) أنَّ صنيع ابن عمر في هذا الحديث يُشكِل مع ما رواه من نهي النبي ﷺ عن بيع الطعام حتى يُستَوفى (يعني كما في حديثه السابق) قال الطحاوي: فما كانت حاجته في ذلك إلى زيد حتى أخذ ذلك عنه، وحدَّث به بعد ذلك، قال: فكان جوابنا في ذلك بتوفيق الله وعونه: أنه قد يحتمل أن يكون ابن عُمر لم يكن يرى الزيت من الطعام، إذ كان حكمه الائتدام به لا الأكل له، وكان مذهبه حلّ بيع ما اشتُري قبل قبضه من غير الطعام، فلم ير ببيعه لذلك قبل قبضه إياه بأسًا، حتى حدَّثه زيد بما حدثه به، فعَلِم به أنه كالطعام المأكول المشتَرى، لا كالأشياء المبيعة سوى ذلك، فانتهى إلى ما حدثه به زيد فيه وامتنع من بيعه.
