المستدرك على الصحيحين
Al Mustadrak ala al‑Sahihayn
كتاب المكاتب
Book of the Mukatab
قصة مكاتبة سلمان الفارسي - رضى الله عنه -
The story of the mukatabah of Salman al-Farisi (may Allah be pleased with him)
Hadith Number: 2899
اخبرنا ميمون بن إسحاق الهاشمي ببغداد، حدثنا العباس بن محمد الدوري، حدثنا عمرو بن عاصم الكلابي، حدثنا همام، عن عباس الجريري، حدثنا عمرو بن شعيب، عن ابيه، عن جده، قال: قال رسول الله ﷺ:"ايما مكاتب كوتب على الف اوقية فاداها إلا عشر اواق، فهو عبد، وايما مكاتب كوتب على مئة دينار فاداها إلا عشرة دنانير، فهو عبد" (2).
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 2863 - صحيح
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 2863 - صحيح
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Amr bin al-As (may Allah be pleased with them both) that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Any mukatab slave whose contract was made for one thousand uqiyah and who paid all of it except ten uqiyah, he is (still) a slave; and any mukatab whose contract was made for one hundred dinars and who paid all of it except ten dinars, he is (also) a slave."
This hadith has an authentic chain (sahih al-isnad), but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
تخریج الحدیث: «إسناده حسن، وعباس الجُريري: هو ابن فرُّوخ، وليس هو عباسًا الجزري، كما أصلحه الإمام أحمد في "المسند" بعد أن كان في أصل نسخته: عباس الجريري، اعتمادًا على ما قاله شيخه عبد الصمد - وهو ابن عبد الوارث - الذي يرويه عن همام - وهو ابن يحيى العَوْذي - فقد رواه ...» [ترقيم الرساله 2899] [ترقيم الشركة 2881] [ترقيم العلميه 2863]
Takhrij and Tahqiq of Hadith No. 2899 of Al Mustadrak ala al‑Sahihayn
by Shaykh Adil Murshid, Dr. Ahmad Barhoum, Dr. Muhammad Kamil Qarah Balli and Dr. Sa'id al-Lahham
Hadith-science notes and terminology
by Shaykh Adil Murshid, Dr. Ahmad Barhoum, Dr. Muhammad Kamil Qarah Balli and Dr. Sa'id al-Lahham
Hadith-science notes and terminology
Grading: The chain of this hadith is "hasan".
Technical note / Defect ('illah): (In the chain) is "'Abbas al-Jurayri", who is Ibn Farrukh; he is not "'Abbas al-Jazari", as Imam Ahmad in his "Musnad", on the word of his shaykh Abd al-Samad (Ibn Abd al-Warith), changed "al-Jurayri" to "al-Jazari" (although in the original copy it was al-Jurayri). Yet narrators other than Imam Ahmad who narrated it from Abd al-Samad called him "'Abbas al-Jurayri", and other narrators from Hammam (such as Amr bin 'Asim al-Kilabi and Abd Allah bin Yazid al-Muqri') also called him "al-Jurayri". Abu al-Walid al-Tayalisi also gave the attribution "al-Jurayri", but he was alone in naming him "al-'Ala'" in place of "'Abbas". So the correct view is that he is "'Abbas al-Jurayri", as al-Dhahabi said in "al-Kashif". Sulayman bin Sulaym al-Himsi corroborated him in the meaning of this hadith.
Reference / Source: Al-Nasa'i narrated it in "Kitab al-'Itq" (Tuhfat al-Ashraf: 8725) from Abd al-Quddus bin Muhammad, from Amr bin 'Asim, with this same chain.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): (In the chain) is "'Abbas al-Jurayri", who is Ibn Farrukh; he is not "'Abbas al-Jazari", as Imam Ahmad in his "Musnad", on the word of his shaykh Abd al-Samad (Ibn Abd al-Warith), changed "al-Jurayri" to "al-Jazari" (although in the original copy it was al-Jurayri). Yet narrators other than Imam Ahmad who narrated it from Abd al-Samad called him "'Abbas al-Jurayri", and other narrators from Hammam (such as Amr bin 'Asim al-Kilabi and Abd Allah bin Yazid al-Muqri') also called him "al-Jurayri". Abu al-Walid al-Tayalisi also gave the attribution "al-Jurayri", but he was alone in naming him "al-'Ala'" in place of "'Abbas". So the correct view is that he is "'Abbas al-Jurayri", as al-Dhahabi said in "al-Kashif". Sulayman bin Sulaym al-Himsi corroborated him in the meaning of this hadith.
Reference / Source: Al-Nasa'i narrated it in "Kitab al-'Itq" (Tuhfat al-Ashraf: 8725) from Abd al-Quddus bin Muhammad, from Amr bin 'Asim, with this same chain.
(2) إسناده حسن، وعباس الجُريري: هو ابن فرُّوخ، وليس هو عباسًا الجزري، كما أصلحه الإمام أحمد في "المسند" بعد أن كان في أصل نسخته: عباس الجريري، اعتمادًا على ما قاله شيخه عبد الصمد - وهو ابن عبد الوارث - الذي يرويه عن همام - وهو ابن يحيى العَوْذي - فقد رواه عن عبد الصمد غير الإمام أحمد، فقالوا فيه: عباس الجريري، وهو الذي قاله غير واحد ممَّن رواه عن همام غير عبد الصمد، كعمرو بن عاصم الكلابي هنا، وعبد الله بن يزيد المقرئ فيما نقله الدارقطني في "السنن" بإثر الحديث (4213)، وكذلك نسبه أبو الوليد الطيالسي في روايته عن همام، غير أنه انفرد بتسميته العلاء بدل عباس، فالأصح أنه عباس الجُريري كما قال الذهبي في "الكاشف". وقد تابعه على معنى حديثه سليمانُ بن سُليم الحمصي، يرويه عن عمرو بن شعيب. ¤ ¤ وأخرجه النسائي في العِتق كما في "تحفة الأشراف" (8725) عن عبد القدوس بن محمد، عن عمرو بن عاصم، بهذا الإسناد.
Reference / Source: Imam Ahmad (11/ 6726), and Abu Dawud (3927) from Muhammad bin al-Muthanna; both narrated it likewise from Abd al-Samad bin Abd al-Warith, from Hammam.
Note / Clarification: After narrating it from his father, Abd Allah bin Ahmad said that the chain has "'Abbas al-Jazari" because Abd al-Samad said so, although the copy had "al-Jurayri", which my father corrected to "al-Jazari". We say: Ibn al-Muthanna said "'Abbas al-Jurayri" in his narration, and Ahmad bin Sa'id al-Darimi (al-Daraqutni: 4213) supported him, so what was correct is what was in the original copy of Imam Ahmad. In his narration Abd al-Samad said "one hundred uqiyahs" instead of "one thousand uqiyahs".
Note / Clarification: After narrating it from his father, Abd Allah bin Ahmad said that the chain has "'Abbas al-Jazari" because Abd al-Samad said so, although the copy had "al-Jurayri", which my father corrected to "al-Jazari". We say: Ibn al-Muthanna said "'Abbas al-Jurayri" in his narration, and Ahmad bin Sa'id al-Darimi (al-Daraqutni: 4213) supported him, so what was correct is what was in the original copy of Imam Ahmad. In his narration Abd al-Samad said "one hundred uqiyahs" instead of "one thousand uqiyahs".
وأخرجه أحمد 11/ (6726)، وأخرجه أبو داود (3927) عن محمد بن المثنى، كلاهما (أحمد وابن المثنى) عن عبد الصمد بن عبد الوارث، عن همام، به. غير أنَّ عبد الله بن أحمد قال بعد أن روى هذا الحديث عن أبيه، وقال في إسناده: عباس الجزري، قال: كذا قال عبد الصمد: عباس الجزري، كان في النسخة: عباس الجريري، فأصلحه أبي كما قال عبد الصمد: الجزري. قلنا: وأما ابن المثنى فسماه في روايته عباسًا الجريري، وتابعه أحمد بن سعيد بن صخر الدارمي عند الدارقطني (4213)، فالصحيح ما كان في أصل نسخة الإمام أحمد. وقال عبد الصمد في روايته: "على مئة أوقية"، بدل: "على ألف أوقية".
Reference / Source: Al-Nasa'i (5008) narrated it by way of Abu al-Walid al-Tayalisi, from Hammam, from "al-'Ala' al-Jurayri", from Amr bin Shu'ayb.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): He called him "al-'Ala' al-Jurayri", thus agreeing (with the others) in the attribution but being alone in the name ('Ala'). The reliable view is that of those who called him "'Abbas", as al-Dhahabi declared correct. In his narration Abu al-Walid said "one hundred uqiyahs", like Abd al-Samad.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): He called him "al-'Ala' al-Jurayri", thus agreeing (with the others) in the attribution but being alone in the name ('Ala'). The reliable view is that of those who called him "'Abbas", as al-Dhahabi declared correct. In his narration Abu al-Walid said "one hundred uqiyahs", like Abd al-Samad.
وأخرجه النسائي (5008) من طريق أبي الوليد الطيالسي، عن همام، عن العلاء الجُريري، عن عمرو بن شعيب؛ فسماه العلاء الجريري، فوافق غيره في النسبة، وانفرد بالاسم، والقول قول من سماه عباسًا، كما صحَّحه الذهبي. وقال أبو الوليد في روايته: "على مئة وُقيّة"، كعبد الصمد.
Reference / Source: Abu Dawud (3926) narrated it likewise by way of Isma'il bin 'Ayyash, from Sulayman bin Sulaym al-Himsi, from Amr bin Shu'ayb. The wording is: "The mukatab (a slave with a contract to buy his freedom) remains a slave as long as a single dirham of his contract remains unpaid". Its chain too is "hasan".
وأخرج أبو داود (3926) من طريق إسماعيل بن عياش، عن سليمان بن سُليم الحمصي، عن عمرو بن شعيب، به. بلفظ: "المكاتَب عبدٌ ما بقي عليه من مكاتبته درهمٌ". وإسناده حسن أيضًا.
