المستدرك على الصحيحين
Al Mustadrak ala al‑Sahihayn
كتاب : آيات رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم التي في دلائل النبوة
Book of the Signs of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) among the Proofs of Prophethood
لقاء إلياس مع النبى عليهما الصلاة
The meeting of Ilyas (peace be upon him) with the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him)
Hadith Number: 4277
حدثنا ابو العباس احمد بن سعيد المعداني ببخارى، حدثنا عبد الله بن محمود، حدثنا عبدان بن سيار، حدثنا احمد بن عبد الله البرقي، حدثنا يزيد بن يزيد البلوي، حدثنا ابو إسحاق الفزاري، عن الاوزاعي، عن مكحول، عن انس بن مالك، قال: كنا مع رسول الله ﷺ في سفر فنزلنا منزلا، فإذا رجل في الوادي يقول: اللهم اجعلني من امة محمد المرحومة المغفورة المثاب لها، قال: فاشرفت على الوادي، فإذا رجل طوله اكثر من ثلاث مئة ذراع، فقال لي: من انت؟ قال: قلت: انس بن مالك خادم رسول الله ﷺ، قال: اين هو؟ قلت: هو ذا يسمع كلامك، قال: فائته واقرئه مني السلام، وقل له: اخوك إلياس يقرئك السلام، فاتيت النبي ﷺ فاخبرته، فجاء حتى لقيه فعانقه وسلم عليه، ثم قعدا يتحدثان، فقال له: يا رسول الله، إني إنما آكل في كل سنة يوما، وهذا يوم فطري، فآكل انا وانت، فنزلت عليهما مائدة من السماء عليها خبز وحوت وكرفس، فاكلا واطعماني، وصليا العصر، ثم ودعه، ثم رايته مر على السحاب نحو السماء (1).
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4231 - بل موضوع قبح الله من وضعه
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4231 - بل موضوع قبح الله من وضعه
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Anas bin Malik (may Allah be pleased with him); he said: We were with the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) on a journey. We made camp at a place, and suddenly there was a man in the valley saying: 'Allahumma-j'alni min ummati Muhammadin al-marhumati al-maghfurati al-muthabi laha' (O Allah, include me among the nation of Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him), which has been shown mercy, which has been forgiven, and which has been granted reward). Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) says: I looked down into the valley, and there was a man whose height was more than three hundred cubits. He asked me: Who are you? I said: Anas bin Malik, the servant of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him). He asked: Where is he? I said: He is right here, listening to your words. He said: Go to him, convey my salam to him, and tell him: Your brother Ilyas (peace be upon him) sends you salam. So I came to the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) and informed him. He (peace and blessings be upon him) came until he met him, embraced him and greeted him with salam. Then the two of them sat down and talked. Ilyas (peace be upon him) said to him (peace and blessings be upon him): O Messenger of Allah, I eat only one day in the year, and today is my day of breaking the fast, so let you and me eat together. Then a table spread came down to them from the sky, on which there was bread, fish and celery (karafs). They ate and fed me as well. Then the two of them prayed the Asr prayer. After that Ilyas (peace be upon him) bade him (peace and blessings be upon him) farewell, and then I saw him going upon the clouds towards the sky.
This hadith has a sahih (authentic) chain, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
تخریج الحدیث: «خبر موضوع، وهذا إسناد ضعيفٌ بمرَّةٍ كما قال البيهقي في "دلائل النبوة" 5/ 422، وذلك أنَّ يزيد بن يزيد البلوي الموصلي وشيخَه أبا إسحاق - وهو الجُرَشي، لا الفَزَارِي الثقة - لا يُعرفان كما قال ابن الجوزي في "الموضوعات" (408)، وقد حصل هنا خطأ في نسبة أبي إسحاق بأنه الفَزَاري، ...» [ترقيم الرساله 4277] [ترقيم الشركة 4254] [ترقيم العلميه 4231]
Takhrij and Tahqiq of Hadith No. 4277 of Al Mustadrak ala al‑Sahihayn
by Shaykh Adil Murshid, Dr. Ahmad Barhoum, Dr. Muhammad Kamil Qarah Balli and Dr. Sa'id al-Lahham
Hadith-science notes and terminology
by Shaykh Adil Murshid, Dr. Ahmad Barhoum, Dr. Muhammad Kamil Qarah Balli and Dr. Sa'id al-Lahham
Hadith-science notes and terminology
Grading: This is a "mawdu'" (fabricated) report.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): This chain is extremely weak, as al-Bayhaqi said in "Dala'il al-Nubuwwah" 5/ 422. The reason is that Yazid bin Yazid al-Balawi al-Mawsili and his teacher Abu Ishaq (who is "al-Jurashi", not "al-Fazari", who is thiqah) are both unknown (not recognised), as Ibn al-Jawzi said in "al-Mawdu'at" (408). Here an error has occurred in the attribution of Abu Ishaq, in that he was called "al-Fazari", whereas al-Fazari is a thiqah hafiz; the correct position is that he is "al-Jurashi", as he is identified in the narration in Ibn Abi al-Dunya's "al-Hawatif" (102), and via that route Ibn al-Jawzi recorded it in "al-Mawdu'at".
Technical note / Defect ('illah): This chain is extremely weak, as al-Bayhaqi said in "Dala'il al-Nubuwwah" 5/ 422. The reason is that Yazid bin Yazid al-Balawi al-Mawsili and his teacher Abu Ishaq (who is "al-Jurashi", not "al-Fazari", who is thiqah) are both unknown (not recognised), as Ibn al-Jawzi said in "al-Mawdu'at" (408). Here an error has occurred in the attribution of Abu Ishaq, in that he was called "al-Fazari", whereas al-Fazari is a thiqah hafiz; the correct position is that he is "al-Jurashi", as he is identified in the narration in Ibn Abi al-Dunya's "al-Hawatif" (102), and via that route Ibn al-Jawzi recorded it in "al-Mawdu'at".
(1) خبر موضوع، وهذا إسناد ضعيفٌ بمرَّةٍ كما قال البيهقي في "دلائل النبوة" 5/ 422، وذلك أنَّ يزيد بن يزيد البلوي الموصلي وشيخَه أبا إسحاق - وهو الجُرَشي، لا الفَزَارِي الثقة - لا يُعرفان كما قال ابن الجوزي في "الموضوعات" (408)، وقد حصل هنا خطأ في نسبة أبي إسحاق بأنه الفَزَاري، والفزاري ثقة حافظ، وإنما الصحيح أنه الجُرَشي كما جاء منسوبًا في رواية ابن أبي الدنيا في "الهواتف" (102)، ومن طريقه أخرجه ابن الجوزي في "الموضوعات".
Grading: Al-Dhahabi, in "al-Talkhis", following up on al-Hakim's declaring it sahih, said: "Rather, it is fabricated; may Allah disgrace whoever fabricated it." He said: either Yazid al-Balawi forged it or Ibn Sayyar.
وقال الذهبي في "تلخيصه" متعقِّبًا على تصحيح الحاكم له: بل موضوعٌ قبَّح اللهُ مَن وضعه، قال: فإما يزيد البَلَوي افتراهُ وإما ابن سيار.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): We (the editors) say: Ibn Sayyar (whom al-Dhahabi mentioned in "al-Mizan" and Ibn Hajar in "al-Lisan" under the name "'Abdan bin Yasar") is not alone in it, because Ibrahim bin Sa'id al-Jawhari also narrated it from Yazid al-Balawi. Therefore it revolves around al-Balawi and his teacher Abu Ishaq, so it is fabricated either by al-Balawi or by his teacher. Allah knows best.
قلنا: لم ينفرد به ابن سيار - وقد ذكره الذهبي في "الميزان" وعنه ابن حجر في "اللسان" فسمّاه: عبدان بن يسار - فقد رواه إبراهيم بن سعيد الجوهري عن يزيد البلوي، فمداره على البَلَوي وشيخه أبي إسحاق، فيكون إما من وضع البَلَوي أو شيخه، والله تعالى أعلم.
Grading: Likewise Ibn Kathir judged it to be "mawdu'" in "al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah" 2/ 275. He said: "This hadith is fabricated, contradicts the sahih hadiths in several respects, and its meaning is also not sound." Then he mentioned some of the respects in which it contradicts them and is objectionable (nakarah).
وكذلك حكم بوضعه ابن كثير في "البداية والنهاية" 2/ 275، فقال: حديث موضوع، مخالف للأحاديث الصحاح من وجوه، ومعناه لا يصح أيضًا؛ ثم ذكر بعضَ وجوهِ مخالفتِه ونكارتِه.
Reference / Source: Ibn Shahin narrated it (as al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar said in "al-Isabah" 2/ 307) via Khayr bin 'Arafah, from Hani' bin al-Mutawakkil, from Baqiyyah bin al-Walid, from al-Awza'i, from Makhul, from Wathilah bin al-Asqa'. (That narration) contains a story like the hadith of Anas here, but longer and more detailed, and states that this took place at Tabuk.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar (2/ 309) quoted Ibn al-Jawzi's statement: "Perhaps Baqiyyah heard this from a liar and committed tadlis by naming al-Awza'i." We say: Ibn Hibban said about Hani' bin al-Mutawakkil in "al-Majruhin": "Munkar reports (manakir) were inserted into his narrations and became numerous, so it is not permissible to use him as a proof in any case."
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar (2/ 309) quoted Ibn al-Jawzi's statement: "Perhaps Baqiyyah heard this from a liar and committed tadlis by naming al-Awza'i." We say: Ibn Hibban said about Hani' bin al-Mutawakkil in "al-Majruhin": "Munkar reports (manakir) were inserted into his narrations and became numerous, so it is not permissible to use him as a proof in any case."
وقد رواهُ ابن شاهين كما قال الحافظ ابن حجر في "الإصابة" 2/ 307 من طريق خير بن عرفة، عن هانئ بن المتوكّل، عن بقية بن الوليد، عن الأوزاعي، عن مكحول، سمعتُ واثلة بن الأسقع، فذكره نحو حديث أنس الذي هنا بأطول منه وأبسط وأنَّ ذلك كان في غزوة تبوك. ونقل الحافظ 2/ 309 عن ابن الجوزي قوله: لعلَّ بقية سمع هذا من كذّاب فدلَّسه عن الأوزاعي. قلنا: وهانئ بن المتوكل قال عنه ابن حبان في "المجروحين": كانت تُدخَل عليه المناكير، فكثرت، فلا يجوز الاحتجاج به بحالٍ.
