Grading: Its chain is "talif" (ruined / worthless).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Its narrator Yahya bin al-'Ala' is "muttaham" (accused of lying); Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal said that he is a liar who fabricated hadith, and Ibn 'Adi said that his hadiths are mawdu' (fabricated). When Imam al-Daraqutni was asked about this hadith, he said in "al-'Ilal" (1015) that it is not established.
Important point: Muslim bin Ibrahim refers to al-Azdi al-Farahidi, and Yahya bin Sa'id refers to al-Ansari.

Reference / Source: Imam al-Tabarani narrated it in "al-Kabir" (3890) and "al-Du'a'" (1933), Imam al-Bayhaqi in "Shu'ab al-Iman" (6034) and Ibn 'Asakir at (16/ 27), through various routes via Muslim bin Ibrahim with this same chain.

Reference / Source: It was narrated by Ibn Abi al-Dunya in "al-Ishraf" (6), Ibn 'Adi in "al-Kamil" (7/ 199), Ibn 'Asakir at (16/ 47, 48) and Ibn al-Jawzi in "al-'Ilal al-Mutanahiyah" (1212) through the route of Harami bin 'Umarah from Yahya bin al-'Ala'.

Technical note / Defect ('illah): We say: although Yahya bin al-'Ala' has been corroborated, these are corroborations that bring no benefit or comfort (that is, they are themselves extremely weak). Thus Ibn 'Asakir (16/ 48) narrated it through the route of al-Mu'alla (Ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Wasiti) from Yahya bin Sa'id, while al-Mu'alla himself is "accused of fabrication" and Imam al-Daraqutni declared him a liar.

Reference / Source: Likewise, Ibn al-Sunni narrated it in "'Amal al-Yawm wa al-Laylah" (282) through the route of Qatadah bin Di'amah, and Ibn 'Asakir at (16/ 48) through the route of Isma'il bin Muhammad al-Sahmi, both of them from Sa'id bin al-Musayyab.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): The chain of each of them contains some weak or majhul (unknown) narrator, so these chains are not free of criticism.