Hazrat Ibn Sirin states that the judges used to decide that when a person sells something, release is not obligatory upon him; it will be for its owner when he demands it, and it will be taken as its equivalent.

Ayyub narrates that a woman sold her husband's house in his absence. When he returned, he refused to uphold the sale. The case was brought before the court of Hazrat Iyas bin Mu'awiyah. The buyer began to say, "May Allah set you right, I have spent two thousand dirhams on it." He (Iyas) said, "Your two thousand are due upon me, your two thousand are due upon me." Hazrat Iyas decided the house in favor of the man and ordered the woman to be imprisoned. When they saw this, they approved the sale.

Muhammad Khulas considered it a strong condition and was strict about it.

According to Hasan, Khul‘ had no legal status.

Hazrat Mukhtar bin Fulful says that I asked Hazrat Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) about the testimony of a slave, so he replied that it is valid.

Hazrat Shurayh considered the testimony of a slave to be valid.

Ibrahim says that the predecessors considered the testimony of a slave valid in minor matters.

Hazrat Ammar Dahni narrates that in front of me, in the court of Hazrat Shurayh, a slave gave testimony regarding a house, and he accepted his testimony as valid. Someone said, "But he is a slave." He replied, "We are all slaves, and our mother is Hawwa (Eve)."

Hazrat Sha'bi narrates that once Hazrat Shurayh said, "We do not consider the testimony of a slave to be valid." Hazrat Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) said, "We used to consider the testimony of a slave to be valid." After that, Hazrat Shurayh would accept the testimony of a slave in favor of everyone except his master.

21495 - He said: So Shurayh (afterwards) would permit it except (for his master).