Technical note: (1) In manuscripts (S), (B) and ('A) it was distorted into: Salim.

Technical note: (2) This is how the author named him here: Burayd bin 'Abd Allah, and he named him the same way at number (1354) later; al-Bayhaqi narrated it from him in "al-Sunan" (3/387) and in "al-Dala'il" (7/242-243) and remained silent on it. But al-Hakim himself contradicted this, as in "Su'alat al-Sijzi" (152), where al-Sijzi said: I asked him about Abu Burdah al-Hanafi, who narrates from 'Alqamah bin Marthad, and he said: 'Amr bin Yazid, a shaykh from the people of Kufah.

Technical note: Al-Mizzi held in "Tuhfat al-Ashraf" (2/76) that this Abu Burdah, who narrates from 'Alqamah bin Marthad and from whom Abu Mu'awiyah al-Darir narrates, is 'Amr bin Yazid al-Tamimi, and he reported that in "Tahdhib al-Kamal" (22/299) from Ibn Ma'in. Al-Daraqutni stated it decisively, as Ibn al-Mulaqqin reported from him in "al-Badr al-Munir" (5/202). Al-Busiri also held this in "Misbah al-Zujajah" (2/26), saying that al-Hakim's authenticating it and naming him Burayd bin 'Abd Allah is questionable and that his name is 'Amr bin Yazid. Ibn 'Abd al-Hadi also held al-Hakim to have erred in his "Mustadrak", in "al-Tanqih" (2/617).

Technical note: (3) In al-Dhahabi's "Talkhis al-Mustadrak": "la tanzi'u" (do not remove).

Grading: (4) It is "hasan li-ghayrihi", and this chain is weak. The correct view about Abu Burdah is that he is 'Amr bin Yazid, as we explained above, and he is weak: Ibn Ma'in, Abu Hatim, Abu Dawud and others declared him weak. Abu Mu'awiyah refers to Muhammad bin Khazim al-Darir, and its Companion is Buraydah bin al-Husayb.

Reference / Source: Ibn Majah (1466) narrated it from Sa'id bin Yahya bin al-Azhar from Abu Mu'awiyah from Abu Burdah (without naming him) with this same chain.

Corroborating chains and supporting reports: It is supported by the hadith of 'A'ishah coming at number (4446), whose chain is hasan.