المستدرك على الصحيحين
Al Mustadrak ala al‑Sahihayn
كتاب النكاح
Book of Marriage
مهر أم حبيبة - رضي الله عنها - أربعة آلاف
The dowry of Umm Habibah (may Allah be pleased with her) was four thousand
Hadith Number: 2776
حدثني ابو بكر محمد بن احمد بن بالويه، حدثنا ابو بكر محمد بن شاذان الجوهري، حدثنا معلى بن منصور، حدثنا ابن المبارك، اخبرنا معمر، عن الزهري، عن عروة، عن ام حبيبة: انها كانت تحت عبيد الله بن جحش، فمات بارض الحبشة، فزوجها النجاشي النبي ﷺ، وامهرها عنه اربعة آلاف، وبعث بها إلى رسول الله ﷺ مع شرحبيل بن حسنة (1).
هذا حديث صحيح على شرط الشيخين، ولم يخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 2741 - على شرط البخاري ومسلم
هذا حديث صحيح على شرط الشيخين، ولم يخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 2741 - على شرط البخاري ومسلم
It is narrated from Urwah that Sayyidah Umm Habibah (may Allah be pleased with her) was married to Ubaydullah bin Jahsh, and he died in the land of Abyssinia. So the Negus (al-Najashi) married her to the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), paid her dowry of four thousand (dirhams) on his (peace and blessings be upon him) behalf, and sent her to the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) with Shurahbil bin Hasanah.
This hadith is sahih (authentic) on the condition of the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim), but they did not record it.
تخریج الحدیث: «إسناده صحيح،وقد اختلف فيه على الزُّهْري في وصله وإرساله، كما بيناه في "مسند أحمد" 45/ (27408)، وقد تابع معمرًا - وهو ابن راشد - على وصله عبد الرحمن بن خالد بن مسافر، كما سيأتي. ابن المبارك: هو عبد الله.» [ترقيم الرساله 2776] [ترقيم الشركة 2757] [ترقيم العلميه 2741]
Takhrij and Tahqiq of Hadith No. 2776 of Al Mustadrak ala al‑Sahihayn
by Shaykh Adil Murshid, Dr. Ahmad Barhoum, Dr. Muhammad Kamil Qarah Balli and Dr. Sa'id al-Lahham
Hadith-science notes and terminology
by Shaykh Adil Murshid, Dr. Ahmad Barhoum, Dr. Muhammad Kamil Qarah Balli and Dr. Sa'id al-Lahham
Hadith-science notes and terminology
Grading: Its isnad is "sahih".
Technical note / Defect ('illah): There is a disagreement from al-Zuhri over whether this narration is "muttasil" (connected) or "mursal", as we have explained in "Musnad Ahmad" (45/ 27408). Ma'mar bin Rashid was corroborated (supported) in narrating it as connected by 'Abd al-Rahman bin Khalid bin Musafir, as will come. Ibn al-Mubarak in the chain refers to "'Abdullah bin al-Mubarak".
Technical note / Defect ('illah): There is a disagreement from al-Zuhri over whether this narration is "muttasil" (connected) or "mursal", as we have explained in "Musnad Ahmad" (45/ 27408). Ma'mar bin Rashid was corroborated (supported) in narrating it as connected by 'Abd al-Rahman bin Khalid bin Musafir, as will come. Ibn al-Mubarak in the chain refers to "'Abdullah bin al-Mubarak".
(1) إسناده صحيح. وقد اختلف فيه على الزُّهْري في وصله وإرساله، كما بيناه في "مسند أحمد" 45/ (27408)، وقد تابع معمرًا - وهو ابن راشد - على وصله عبد الرحمن بن خالد بن مسافر، كما سيأتي. ابن المبارك: هو عبد الله.
Reference / Source: Abu Dawud (2107) narrated it through the chain of Hajjaj bin Abi Ya'qub al-Thaqafi from Mu'alla bin Mansur.
وأخرجه أبو داود (2107) عن حجاج بن أبي يعقوب الثقفي، عن معلّى بن منصور، بهذا الإسناد.
Reference / Source: Ahmad (27408) and al-Nasa'i (5486) narrated it through various routes from 'Abdullah bin al-Mubarak. Also, through his route this narration will come in abridged form at number (5286).
وأخرجه أحمد (27408)، والنسائي (5486) من طرق عن عبد الله بن المبارك، به. وسيأتي من طريقه مختصرًا (5286).
Reference / Source: Abu Dawud (2086) narrated it in abridged form through the route of 'Abd al-Razzaq from Ma'mar.
وأخرجه مختصرًا أبو داود (2086) من طريق عبد الرزاق، عن معمر، به.
Reference / Source: Ibn Hibban (6027) narrated it through the route of 'Abd al-Rahman bin Khalid bin Musafir from Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri.
Note / Clarification: However, this narration does not mention the dowry of Umm Habibah (may Allah be pleased with her).
Note / Clarification: However, this narration does not mention the dowry of Umm Habibah (may Allah be pleased with her).
وأخرجه ابن حبان (6027) من طريق عبد الرحمن بن خالد بن مسافر، عن ابن شهاب الزُّهْري، به. لكن دون ذكر صداق أم حبيبة.
Reference / Source: Abu Dawud (2108) narrated it through Yunus bin Yazid from al-Zuhri as "mursal".
Important point: In this narration, the amount of four thousand is specified as "dirhams".
Important point: In this narration, the amount of four thousand is specified as "dirhams".
وأخرجه أبو داود (2108) من طريق يونس بن يزيد، عن الزُّهْري مرسلًا. وقُيِّدت به الأربعة آلاف بالدرهم.
Note / Clarification: This narration will come with the author (al-Hakim) later at number (6929) through the route of 'Abd al-Rahman bin 'Abd al-'Aziz, and at number (6923) through the route of 'Ubaydullah bin Abi Ziyad al-Rusafi, as "mursal".
Technical note / Defect ('illah): In al-Rusafi's mursal narration, the dowry of Umm Habibah (may Allah be pleased with her) is mentioned as "forty uqiyahs", which is "gharib" (singular/strange), while the other narration does not mention the dowry at all.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): In al-Rusafi's mursal narration, the dowry of Umm Habibah (may Allah be pleased with her) is mentioned as "forty uqiyahs", which is "gharib" (singular/strange), while the other narration does not mention the dowry at all.
وسيأتي كذلك عند المصنف برقم (6929) من طريق عبد الرحمن بن عبد العزيز، وبرقم (6923) من طريق عُبيد الله بن أبي زياد الرُّصافي، كلاهما عن الزُّهْري، مرسلًا. لكن ذكر هذا الأخير في مرسله أنَّ صداق أم حبيبة كان أربعين أوقية. وهو غريب، ولم يذكر الآخر الصداق.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: The mention of the dowry of Umm Habibah (may Allah be pleased with her) is supported by the mursal narration of Imam Abu Ja'far Muhammad bin 'Ali bin al-Husayn al-Baqir, found in Ibn Ishaq's "al-Sirah" (Sirat Ibn Hisham 1/ 224), but there the amount of the dowry is given as "four hundred dinars".
Important point: Four hundred dinars are worth approximately four thousand dirhams, so the two narrations agree on the amount of the dowry. This mursal narration will come with the author (al-Hakim) later at number (6927) through a route other than that of Ibn Ishaq, but the route of Ibn Ishaq is better (amthal). See also the supporting material earlier at number (2760).
Important point: Four hundred dinars are worth approximately four thousand dirhams, so the two narrations agree on the amount of the dowry. This mursal narration will come with the author (al-Hakim) later at number (6927) through a route other than that of Ibn Ishaq, but the route of Ibn Ishaq is better (amthal). See also the supporting material earlier at number (2760).
ويشهد لذكر صداق أم حبيبة مرسل أبي جعفر محمد بن علي بن الحسين الباقر عند ابن إسحاق في "السيرة" كما في "سيرة ابن هشام" 1/ 224 لكنه قال: أربع مئة دينار، قلنا: والأربع مئة دينار تساوي أربعة آلاف درهم تقريبًا، فاتفقا. ¤ ¤ وسيأتي هذا المرسل برقم (6927) من طريق أخرى غير طريق ابن إسحاق، وطريق ابن إسحاق أمثل. وانظر ما تقدم برقم (2760).
