Important point: In our manuscripts it is corrupted here and written as "al-Husayn".

Grading: The report is sahih.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): There is disagreement over its chain from Ata' bin Abi Muslim al-Khurasani. Ibn al-A'rabi narrated it in his "Mu'jam" (640), al-Tabarani in "al-Kabir" (13435), "al-Awsat" (6491) and "al-Shamiyyin" (2460), and Abu Nu'aym in "al-Hilyah" (10/219), by way of Ammar bin Ruzayq, from Fitr bin Khalifah, from al-Qasim bin Abi Bazzah, from Ata' al-Khurasani, from Humran, from Ibn Umar, at length.

Note / Clarification: Three narrators reported from Humran (the mawla of al-Ablat), and Ibn Hibban mentioned him in "al-Thiqat". In some of the sources the name is corrupted into "Imran".

Details of the narration: Muhammad bin Fudayl narrated it in "al-Du'a'" (93), and through him Abu Ya'la in "Mu'jam Shuyukhihi" (84), by way of Fitr bin Khalifah, from al-Muthanna bin al-Sabbah, from Ata' al-Khurasani, from Ibn Umar; Humran is not mentioned in it.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Al-Muthanna bin al-Sabbah is weak; also, Imam Ahmad (9/5544) narrated it by way of Ayyub bin Sulayman al-San'ani, who is "majhul" (unknown), from Ata' al-Khurasani, from Ibn Umar, at length.

Technical note / Defect ('illah): Ibn Adi narrated it in "al-Kamil" (2/388) and al-Khatib in "Tarikh Baghdad" (9/84) by way of Hafs bin Umar al-Habati. Imam Ibn Ma'in said about Hafs bin Umar: "He is nothing"; he was neither thiqah (trustworthy) nor reliable. He also dropped the intermediary between Ata' al-Khurasani and Ibn Umar.

Reference / Source: Ma'mar narrated it in his "Jami'" (20905) from Ata' al-Khurasani, from Ibn Umar, as "mawquf", and he too did not mention the intermediary.

Details of the narration: Matar al-Warraq narrated it from Nafi', from Ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with them both), as marfu'.

Reference / Source: Abu Dawud (3598), Ibn Majah (2320), Ibn al-A'rabi (292), al-Tabarani (2921), Ibn Adi (3/413), Ibn Bishran (544, 1033), al-Bayhaqi (6/82 and 6310) and al-Khatib (4/619) narrated it through various routes from Matar al-Warraq, from Nafi', from Ibn Umar, as marfu' (at length and in abridged form).
Grading: Because of Matar al-Warraq, its chain is "hasan" in corroborations and supporting reports.

Grading: There are other disagreements in it too, which Imam al-Daraqutni covered comprehensively in "al-Ilal" (2992).
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: This hadith has passed earlier in a similar form at number (2253) by way of Yahya bin Rashid, from Ibn Umar, as marfu', with a "sahih chain".