المستدرك على الصحيحين
Al Mustadrak ala al‑Sahihayn
كتاب الأحكام
Book of Judgments
من أرضى سلطانا بسخط ربه خرج من دين الله
Whoever pleases a ruler by angering his Lord has left the religion of Allah
Hadith Number: 7248
حدثنا ابو بكر بن إسحاق، اخبرنا محمد بن ايوب، اخبرنا غسان بن مالك، حدثنا عنبسة بن عبد الرحمن، عن علاق بن ابي مسلم، قال: سمعت جابر بن عبد الله يقول: قال رسول الله ﷺ:"من ارضى سلطانا بسخط ربه ﷿، خرج من دين الله ﵎" (1). تفرد به علاق بن ابي مسلم، والرواة إليه كلهم ثقات. آخر كتاب الاحكام ﷽ [كتاب الاطعمة]
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 7071 - تفرد به علاق والرواة إليه ثقات
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 7071 - تفرد به علاق والرواة إليه ثقات
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Jabir bin Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with them both) that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Whoever pleases a ruler at the cost of the displeasure of his Lord, the Mighty and Majestic, has left the religion of Allah." Allaq bin Abi Muslim is alone in narrating this, and all the narrators up to him are trustworthy (thiqah).
Here the Book of Rulings (Kitab al-Ahkam) is complete.
تخریج الحدیث: [ترقيم الرساله 7248] [ترقيم الشركة 7166] [ترقيم العلميه 7071]
Takhrij and Tahqiq of Hadith No. 7248 of Al Mustadrak ala al‑Sahihayn
by Shaykh Adil Murshid, Dr. Ahmad Barhoum, Dr. Muhammad Kamil Qarah Balli and Dr. Sa'id al-Lahham
Hadith-science notes and terminology
by Shaykh Adil Murshid, Dr. Ahmad Barhoum, Dr. Muhammad Kamil Qarah Balli and Dr. Sa'id al-Lahham
Hadith-science notes and terminology
Grading: Its chain is "da'if jiddan" (extremely weak).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Concerning Ghassan bin Malik, Abu Hatim said that he is not strong and that objectionable material (nakarah) is evident in his hadith. Anbasah bin Abd al-Rahman is an "accused" narrator, and Anbasah is alone in narrating from his teacher "Allaq"; al-Azdi called him "dhahib al-hadith" (his hadith is worthless), al-Dhahabi called him "wahin" (very feeble) in "al-Kashif", and Ibn Hajr declared him "majhul" (unknown).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Concerning Ghassan bin Malik, Abu Hatim said that he is not strong and that objectionable material (nakarah) is evident in his hadith. Anbasah bin Abd al-Rahman is an "accused" narrator, and Anbasah is alone in narrating from his teacher "Allaq"; al-Azdi called him "dhahib al-hadith" (his hadith is worthless), al-Dhahabi called him "wahin" (very feeble) in "al-Kashif", and Ibn Hajr declared him "majhul" (unknown).
(1) إسناده ضعيف جدًّا، غسان بن مالك قال أبو حاتم: ليس بقوي بيِّنٌ في حديثه الإنكار، وعنبسة بن عبد الرحمن متهم، وشيخه علاق تفرد بالرواية عنه عنبسة، وقال الأزدي: ذاهب الحديث، وقال الذهبي في "الكاشف": واهٍ، وقال ابن حجر: مجهول.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): It is also said that his name is Abd al-Malik bin Allaq, as al-Hafiz al-Mizzi indicated in "al-Tahdhib"; Imam al-Tirmidhi called him "majhul", and al-Azdi declared him "matruk al-hadith".
ويقال: إنه عبد الملك بن علاق، كما أشار إلى ذلك الحافظ المزِّي في "التهذيب"، وجهله الترمذي، وقال الأزدي: متروك الحديث.
Reference / Source: Abu Nu'aym narrated it in "Tarikh Asbahan" (2/348) by way of Ibrahim bin al-Walid, from Ghassan bin Malik, with this same chain.
وأخرجه أبو نعيم في "تاريخ أصبهان" 2/ 348 من طريق إبراهيم بن الوليد، عن غسان بن مالك، بهذا الإسناد.
