Note / Clarification: In the manuscripts (the narrator's name) is written as "Amr bin Sulaym", which is an error of the copyists. Al-Bayhaqi narrated it in "al-Sunan" (8/ 297) from the author (al-Hakim) with his chain and text, and in it he said "Amr bin Sufyan", and in "Ma'rifat al-Sunan wa-l-Athar" (17375) he indicated that more than one person narrated it from al-Aswad bin Qays and said in it "Amr bin Sufyan", and this is what is correct. See his biography in "al-Tahdhib".
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar said in "Ithaf al-Maharah" (7/ 658): "Amr bin Sulaym, and it is said: Ibn Sufyan." So he said, but nothing is preserved in this report except "Amr bin Sufyan".

Grading: This report is sahih from Ibn Abbas and is narrated from him through several routes. This present chain is open to being graded hasan.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Two people narrated from Amr bin Sufyan (al-Thaqafi), and no one besides Ibn Hibban is reported to have declared him trustworthy. And Mu'adh bin Najdah is "of acceptable standing" (salih al-hal), as al-Dhahabi said in "al-Mizan". And both of them have been corroborated.

Reference / Source: It was narrated from Sufyan (al-Thawri) by Abd al-Razzaq in his "Tafsir" (1/ 357), by Abd al-Rahman bin Mahdi with Abu 'Ubayd in "al-Nasikh wa-l-Mansukh" (462), and by Abu Nu'aym al-Fadl bin Dukayn with al-Tabari in his "Tafsir" (14/ 134).
Grading: And al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar declared it sahih in "Fath al-Bari" (13/ 474).
Reference / Source: Also, al-Tabari (14/ 134) and al-Mizzi, in the biography of Amr bin Sufyan in "al-Tahdhib" (22/ 44), narrated it in similar form through various routes from al-Aswad bin Qays.

Reference / Source: And it is narrated from Ibn Abbas with the same meaning through several other routes, which al-Tabari (14/ 135) documented.

Reference / Source: And al-Bukhari mentioned it in suspended form (mu'allaq, without a chain) in his "Sahih", in the Book of Tafsir, under Surah al-Nahl.