Grading: Its chain is "sahih", and Ibn Jurayj explicitly stated that he heard it in al-Bukhari and others, so the suspicion of his tadlis is removed.

Important point: Al-Hafiz al-Dhahabi says in "al-Talkhis": "Rather, the wife to whom no turn was allotted (because she had given her turn to 'A'ishah) was Sawdah." We say: this is what is "correct", as will be explained below.

Reference / Source: Ahmad (3/ 2044) and al-Nasa'i (5285) narrated it by way of Ja'far bin 'Awn with this same chain. Also Ahmad (5/ 3259, 3261), al-Bukhari (5067), Muslim (1465) and al-Nasa'i (8875) narrated it through various routes from Ibn Jurayj; however, al-Bukhari and al-Nasa'i did not mention 'Ikrimah's statement at its end.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Al-Hakim's including this hadith as a supplement (istidrak) is an oversight (dhuhul) on his part. Al-Nasa'i (5288) narrated by way of Sufyan (bin 'Uyaynah), from 'Amr bin Dinar, from 'Ata', from Ibn 'Abbas, who said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) passed away while he had nine wives with whom he had relations, except Sawdah, for she had given her day and night to 'A'ishah.

Important point: Imam al-Bazzar says in his "Musnad" (5172): What is preserved from Ibn 'Abbas through routes other than this one is that the one to whom no turn used to be allotted was Sawdah bint Zam'ah, because she had given her day to 'A'ishah.

Technical note / Defect ('illah): Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar says in "Fath al-Bari" (15/ 224): Qadi 'Iyad said that al-Tahawi said: This (naming Safiyyah) is an error; the correct name is "Sawdah", as has passed that she gave her day to 'A'ishah, and the mistake is from Ibn Jurayj, who narrates it from 'Ata'. Qadi 'Iyad further said: The scholars have mentioned regarding the words of Allah, ﴿تُرْجِي مَنْ تَشَاءُ مِنْهُنَّ﴾ [You may defer whom you will of them] (al-Ahzab: 51), that he (peace and blessings be upon him) kept close 'A'ishah, Hafsah, Zaynab and Umm Salamah and gave them their full turns, while he deferred Sawdah, Juwayriyah, Umm Habibah, Maymunah and Safiyyah, staying with them as he wished. 'Iyad said: So it is possible that Ibn Jurayj's narration (naming Safiyyah) is correct, and that this was at the end of his life when he had brought all of them close, so he allotted turns to all of them except Safiyyah.

Grading: Ibn Hajar says: The preferred view is that the one to whom, according to Ibn 'Abbas, no turn was allotted is "Sawdah", as al-Tahawi said. The evidence for this is the hadith of 'A'ishah that Sawdah gave her day to 'A'ishah, and the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) used to allot to 'A'ishah her own day and the day of Sawdah. This will come in a separate chapter, and the details of the story will be given there, if Allah wills.

Important point: (Ibn Hajar says:) But it is also possible to say: his not spending the night with Sawdah does not necessitate that no turn was allotted to her at all; rather, a turn was allotted to her, but because of that gift he spent that night with 'A'ishah. Yes, it is permissible to say figuratively that she had no allotment (since in practice the night was not spent with her). In my view, the preferred position is what is established in "the Sahih", and perhaps al-Bukhari omitted this addition deliberately.

Note / Clarification: Regarding the words "fa-idha rafa'tum na'shaha" (when you lift her bier), al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar says: It is with an undotted 'ayn and a dotted shin; it means the bed on which the deceased is placed.

Note / Clarification: And the words "fa-la tuza'zi'uha" (do not shake it) are with two dotted zays and two undotted 'ayns; "za'za'ah" means to shake (violently) something that is being carried.

General principle: In the words "wa-la tuzalziluha", "zalzalah" means jolting. It is derived from this that the sanctity of a believer remains after his death just as it was in his life. On this there is the hadith: "Breaking the bone of a dead believer is like breaking it while he is alive." Abu Dawud (3207) and Ibn Majah (1616) narrated it, and Ibn Hibban (3167) declared it sahih.