Hazrat Dahhak (may Allah have mercy on him) says that it is better that when I go to my mother, I say, "O mother! Cover your head."

Hazrat Ikrimah (may Allah have mercy on him) says that for a man to touch the skin of his sister or mother is a part of adultery. (Here in the chapter, the word "yubashir" means the touching of skin to skin, not the commonly understood meaning of intercourse. Also, touching the feet and palms, etc., is not meant.)

Hazrat Muhammad bin Ali (may Allah be pleased with him, may Allah have mercy on him) states that Hazrat Hasan and Hazrat Husain (may Allah be pleased with them) did not use to look at the Mothers of the Believers, whereas Hazrat Abdullah bin Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) considered it permissible for them to look at the Mothers of the Believers.

18183 - And Ibn Abbas held the view that (their seeing) (1) of them is permissible (2).

Ayub (may Allah have mercy on him) says that I asked Hazrat Saeed bin Jubair (may Allah have mercy on him) whether a man can look at the head of his mother-in-law. In response, he recited this verse: "And they should not display their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers-in-law, their sons, their husbands' sons, their brothers, their brothers' sons, or their sisters' sons." Then he said, "Do you see her included among them?"

Hazrat Sha'bi and Hazrat 'Ikrimah d, in the explanation of the verse of the Holy Qur'an { وَلاَ یُبْدِینَ زِینَتَہُنَّ إلاَّ لِبُعُولَتِہِنَّ، أَوْ آبَائِہِنَّ، أَوْ آبَائِ بُعُولَتِہِنَّ } (till the end of the verse), state that there is no mention of paternal and maternal uncles in it, because both are included in the mention of their sons, and it is said that a woman should not remove her scarf in front of her paternal and maternal uncles.

Hazrat Nafi’ (may Allah have mercy on him) narrates that Hazrat Ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with them both) was asked whether a woman can make her slave-girl lawful for her husband. He replied,“I do not know, but if it were the time of Hazrat Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), he would have ordered her to be stoned. Only that slave-girl is lawful for you whom you can sell at your own will, free at your own will, gift if you wish, and marry if you wish.”

Hazrat Ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with them both) says that the permissibility of the private parts is established through complete ownership or marriage, so that if he wishes, he may divorce, if he wishes, he may set free, and if he wishes, he may give as a gift.

Hazrat Mughira (may Allah have mercy on him) says that I asked Ibrahim (may Allah have mercy on him) whether a woman's slave-girl is lawful for her son. He replied that lawfulness is established through marriage, gift, or purchase.

Hasan (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "The private part is not taken on loan. If someone has intercourse with the owner's permission, then it belongs to him."