Hazrat Sha'bi and Ibrahim said: Whoever ties an animal in the pathway will be held responsible.

29872 - From Hammad, from Ibrahim (they both said) (1): Whoever ties an animal in the road is liable.

Hazrat Ash'ath states that Hasan Basri did not prescribe anything specific for a bone-breaking wound.

Hazrat Qatadah says that Abdul Malik bin Marwan decreed one camel for a wound on the head from which blood comes out but does not flow; and for a wound on the bone in which blood does not flow, he decreed two camels. And for a wound in which the flesh is torn but the bone is not broken, he decreed three camels.

Hazrat Mughira and Hazrat Hammad state that it is narrated from Ibrahim regarding two such slaves, one of whom gouged out the eye of his companion. He said: If the value of both is equal, then an eye will be gouged out in exchange for an eye, and if the value of one is greater than the other, then the one with the higher value will be returned to the one with the lower value.

29876 - From Hammad, from Ibrahim, regarding two slaves, one of whom gouges out the eye of his companion, he said: If their values are equal, then an eye for an eye; but if the value of one of them is greater than the (other) (1) (the greater) (2) compensates the lesser.

Hazrat Ibn Jurayj states that I asked Hazrat Ata regarding a slave who intentionally killed another slave, while the murdered slave was better than the killer. What will be the ruling in this case? He replied: The master of the murdered slave will only receive the killer slave; he will not get anything else besides this. And Hazrat Amr bin Dinar, in response to this, said: He will only receive the killer of his slave; if he wishes, he may kill him, and if he wishes, he may keep him as a slave.

29878 - And Amr ibn Dinar said: They have nothing except the killer of their slave; if they wish, they kill him, and if they wish, they enslave him.

Hazrat Muammar narrates that Hazrat Ziyad bin Muslim said: A man from India came to Aden with a guarantee of safety, but one of the Muslims killed him because of his brother. So a letter was written to Hazrat Umar bin Abdul Aziz regarding this matter, and he replied: Do not kill him; take blood money from him and send that blood money to the heirs of the murdered person. And by your order, he was imprisoned.

Hazrat Yusuf bin Yaqub narrates that a man from among the polytheists killed a Muslim man, then that person entered (the Muslim area) under protection, so the brother of the Muslim killed him. Thus, Hazrat Umar bin Abdul Aziz decided upon the payment of blood money against him: and he placed the burden of this blood money upon his wealth and imprisoned him, and the blood money was sent to the heirs of the slain who were present among the people at war.